
THE HISTORY OF THE GERMANIC TRIBES & RACES
The Germanic Peoples (also called Teutonic in older literature) are a
historical ethno-linguistic group, originating in Northern Europe
and
identified by their use of the Indo-European Germanic languages which
diversified out of Common Germanic in
the course of the Pre-Roman Iron
Age. The descendants of these peoples became, and in many areas
contributed to,
the ethnic groups of North Western Europe: the Germans,
Norwegians, Swedish, Finland-Swedes, Danish, Faroese, English,
Icelanders,
Austrians, Dutch and Flemish, and the inhabitants of Switzerland, Alsace,
Lorraine (German: Lothringen)
and Friesland on the continent.
Migrating
Germanic peoples spread throughout Europe in Late Antiquity (300-600)
and the Early Middle Ages. Germanic languages
became dominant along the Roman
borders (Austria, Germany, Netherlands, Belgium and England), but in the rest
of the (western) Roman provinces, the Germanic immigrants adopted Latin (Romance)
dialects. Furthermore, all Germanic
peoples were eventually Christianized to
varying extents. The Germanic people played a large role in transforming the
Roman Empire into Medieval Europe.
The History of The Term Germanic
Various etymologies
for Latin Germani are possible. As an adjective, germani is
simply the plural of the adjective germanus (from germen, "seed" or "offshoot"),
which has the sense of "related" or "kindred" or
"authentic". According to Strabo,
the Romans introduced the name Germani, because the Germanic tribes were the
authentic Celts (γνησίους Γαλάτας;
gnisíous Galátas). Alternatively, it may refer
from
this use based on Roman experience of the Germanic tribes as allies of the Celts.
The ethnonym seems to be attested in the Fasti Capitolini
inscription for the year 222,
DE
GALLEIS INSVBRIBVS ET GERM(aneis), where it may simply refer to "related"
peoples, namely related to the
Gauls. Furthermore, since the inscriptions were
erected only in 17 to 18 BCE, the word may be a later addition to the
text. Another
early mentioning of the name, this time by Poseidonios (writing around 80 BCE), is
also dubious, as
it only survives in a quotation by Athenaios (writing around 190
CE); the mention of Germani in this context was more
likely inserted by Athenaios
rather than by Poseidonios himself. The writer who apparently introduced the name
"Germani"
into the corpus of classical literature is Julius Caesar. He uses Germani
in two slightly differing ways: one to describe
any non-gaulic peoples of Germania,
and one to denote the Germani Cisrhenani, a somewhat diffuse group of peoples in
north-eastern Gaul, who cannot clearly be identified as either Celtic or Germanic.
In this sense, Germani may be a loan from a Celtic exonym applied to the Germanic
tribes, based on a word for "neighbour". Tacitus suggests that it might be from a
tribe which changed
its name after the Romans adapted it, but there is no evidence
for this. The suggestion deriving the name from Gaulish
term for "neighbour" invokes
Old Irish gair, Welsh ger, "near", Irish gearr, "cut, short"
(a short distance), from
a Proto-Celtic root *gerso-s, further related to ancient Greek chereion, "inferior"
and English gash. The Proto-Indo-European root could be of the form *khar-, *kher-,
*ghar-, *gher-, "cut",
from which also Hittite kar-, "cut", whence also Greek character.
Apparently, the Germanic tribes did not have a self-designation ("endonym")
that
included all Germanic-speaking people but excluded all non-Germanic people. Non-
Germanic peoples (primarily
Celtic, Roman, Greek, the citizens of the Roman Empire),
on the other hand, were called *walha- (this word lives forth
in names such as Wales,
Welsh, Cornwall, Walloons, Vlachs etc.). Yet, the name of the Suebi - which designated
a
larger group of tribes and was used almost indiscriminately with Germani in Caesar
- was possibly a Germanic equivalent
of the Latin name (*swē-ba- "authentic").

The Term of Teutonic or Deutsch
Trying to identify a contemporary vernacular term and the
associated nation
with a classical name, Latin writers from the 10th century onwards used the
learnèd adjective
teutonicus (originally derived from the Teutones) to refer
to East Francia ("Regnum Teutonicum") and its inhabitants.
This usage is
still partly present in modern English; hence the English use of "Teutons"
in reference
to the Germanic peoples in general besides the specific tribe
of the Teutons defeated at the Battle of Aquae Sextiae
in 102 BCE.
The generic *þiuda-
"people" occurs in many personal names such as Thiud-reks
and also in the ethnonym of the Swedes from a cognate
of Old English Sweo-ðēod
and Old Norse: Sui-þióð (see e.g. Sö Fv1948;289). Additionally,
þiuda- appears
in Angel-ðēod ("Anglo-Saxon people") and Gut-þiuda ("Gothic people").
The
adjective derived from this noun, *þiudiskaz, "popular", was later used with
reference to
the language of the people in contrast to the Latin language
(earliest recorded example 786). The word is continued
in German Deutsch
(meaning German), English "Dutch", Dutch Duits and Diets (the latter referring
to
Dutch, the former meaning German) and Swedish/Danish/Norwegian tysk
(meaning German).
The Classification of The Germanic Race
By the 1st century CE, the writings of Caesar, Tacitus and
other
Roman era writers indicate a division of Germanic-speaking peoples
into tribal groupings centred on:
*......... the rivers Oder and Vistula/Weichsel (East
Germanic tribes),
*................................................... the lower Rhine river (Istvaeones),
* ................................................................the river Elbe (Irminones),
* ...................................Jutland
and the Danish islands (Ingvaeones).
The
Sons of Mannus, Istvaeones, Irminones, and Ingvaeones are collectively
called West Germanic tribes. In addition, those
Germanic people who remained
in Scandinavia are referred to as North Germanic. These groups all developed
separate
dialects, the basis for the differences among Germanic language down
to the present day. Detail of the Uppland Rune
Inscription 871 (12th century)
The
division of peoples into West Germanic, East Germanic, and North Germanic
is a modern linguistic classification. Many
Greek scholars only classified
Celts and Scythians in the Northwest and Northeast of the Mediterranean and this
classification was widely maintained in Greek literature until Late Antiquity.
Latin-Greek ethnographers (Tacitus, Pliny
the Elder, Ptolemy, and Strabo)
mentioned in the first two centuries the names of peoples they classified as
Germanic
along the Elbe, the Rhine, and the Danube, the Vistula and on the Baltic
Sea. Tacitus mentioned 40, Ptolemy 69 peoples.
Classical ethnography applied the
name Suebi to many tribes in the first century. It appeared that this native name
had all but replaced the foreign name Germanic. After the Marcomannic wars the
Gothic name steadily gained importance.
Some of the ethnic names mentioned by the
ethnographers of the first two centuries on the shores of the Oder and the
Vistula
(Gutones, Vandali) reappear from the 3rd century on in the area of the lower Danube
and north of the Carpathian
Mountains. For the end of the 5th century the Gothic
name can be used - according to the historical sources - for such
different peoples
like the Goths in Gaul, Iberia and Italy, the Vandals in Africa, the Gepids along the
Tisza and the Danube, the Rugians, Sciri and Burgundians, even the Iranian Alans.
These peoples were classified as Scyths
and often deducted from the ancient Getae
(most important: Cassiodor / Jordanes, Getica around 550).

The Bronz Age
Regarding the question of ethnic origins, evidence developed by archaeologists
and linguists suggests that a people or group of peoples sharing a common
material culture dwelt in a region defined
by the Nordic Bronze Age culture
between 1700 BCE and 600 BCE. The Germanic tribes then inhabited southern
Scandinavia
and Schleswig, but subsequent Iron Age cultures of the same region,
like Wessenstedt (800 to 600 BCE) and Jastorf, are
also in consideration. The
change of Proto-Indo-European to Proto-Germanic has been defined by the first
sound
shift (or Grimm's law) and must have occurred when mutually intelligible
dialects or languages in a Sprachbund were
still able to convey such a change
to the whole region. So far it has been impossible to date this event conclusively.
The precise interaction between these peoples is not known,
however, they are tied
together and influenced by regional features and migration patterns linked to
prehistoric
cultures like Hügelgräber, Urnfield, and La Tene. A deteriorating climate
in Scandinavia around 850 BCE to
760 BCE and a later and more rapid one around 650
BCE might have triggered migrations to the coast of Eastern Germany
and further towards
the Vistula. A contemporary northern expansion of Hallstatt drew part of these peoples
into
the Celtic hemisphere, including nordwestblock areas and the region of Elp culture
(1800 BCE to 800 BCE). At around this
time, this culture became influenced by Hallstatt
techniques of how to extract bog iron from the ore in peat bogs, ushering
in the

The Pre-Roman Iron Age
Archeological
evidence suggests a relatively uniform Germanic people were located at about
750 BCE from the Netherlands to the Vistula
and in Southern Scandinavia. In the west the
coastal floodplains were populated for the first time, since in adjacent
higher grounds the
population had increased and the soil became exhausted. At about 250 BCE, some expansion to
the
south had occurred and five general groups can be distinguished: North Germanic in southern
Scandinavia, excluding Jutland;
North Sea Germanic, along the North Sea and in Jutland; Rhine-
Weser Germanic, along the middle Rhine and Weser; Elbe
Germanic, along the middle Elbe; and East
Germanic, between the middle Oder and the Vistula. This concurs with linguistic
evidence pointing
at the development of five linguistic groups, mutually linked into sets of two to four groups
that shared linguistic innovations.
This period witnessed the advent of Celtic culture of Hallstatt and La Tene signature in
previous
Northern Bronze Age territory, especially to the western extends. However, some proposals suggest
this
Celtic superstrate was weak, while the general view in the Netherlands holds that this Celtic
influence did not involve
intrusions at all and assume fashion and a local development from Bronze
Age culture. It is generally accepted such
a Celtic superstratum was virtually absent to the East,
featuring the Germanic Wessenstedt and Jastorf cultures. The
Celtic influence and contacts between
Gaulish and early Germanic culture along the Rhine is assumed as the source of
a number of Celtic
loanwords in Proto-Germanic.
Frankenstein and Rowlands (1978), and Wells (1980) have suggested late
Hallstatt trade contact to be
a direct catalyst for the development of an elite class that came into existence around
northeastern
France, the Middle Rhine region, and adjacent Alpine regions (Collis 1984:41), culminating to new
cultural
developments and the advent of the classical Gaulish La Tene Culture The development of La
Tene culture extended to
the north around 200 to 150 BCE, including the North German Plain, Denmark
and Southern Scandinavia:
"In certain cremation
graves, situated at some distance from other graves, Celtic metalwork
appears: brooches and swords, together with wagons,
Roman cauldrons and drinking vessels. The
area of these rich graves is the same as the places where later (the first
century CE) princely
graves are found. A ruling class seems to have emerged, distinguished by the possession of large
farms and rich gravegifts such as weapons for the men and silver objects for the women, imported
earthenware and
Celtic items."
The first Germani in Roman ethnography cannot be clearly identified as either Germanic or Celtic in
the modern
ethno-linguistic sense, and it has been generally held the traditional clear cut division
along the Rhine between both
ethnic groups was primarily motivated by Roman politics. Caesar described
the Eburones as a Germanic tribe on the Gallic
side of the Rhine, and held other tribes in the neigh
bourhood as merely calling themselves of Germanic stock. Even though
names like Eburones and Ambiorix
were Celtic and, archeologically, this area shows strong Celtic influences, the problem
is difficult.
Some 20th century writers consider the possibility of a separate "Nordwestblock" identity of
the tribes
settled along the Rhine at the time, assuming the arrival of a Germanic superstrate from the 1st
century
BCE and a subsequent "Germanization" or language replacement through the "elite-dominance"model.
However, immigration of Germanic Batavians from Hessen in the northern extent of this same tribal region
is, archeologically
speaking, hardly noticeable and certainly did not populate an exterminated country,
very unlike Tacitus suggested. Here,
probably due to the local indigenous pastoral way of life, the
acceptance of Roman culture turned out to be particularly
slow and, contrary to expected, the indigenous
culture of the previous Eburones rather seems to have absorbed the intruding
(Batavian) element, thus
making it very hard to define the real extents of the pre-Roman Germanic indigenous territories.
Germanic expansions during early Roman times are known only
generally, but it is
clear that the forebears of the Goths were settled on the southern Baltic shore
by 100 CE.
The early Germanic tribes are assumed to have spoken mutually intelligible
dialects, in the sense that Germanic languages
derive from a single earlier parent
language. No written records of such a parent language exists. From what we know
of scanty early written material, by the fifth century CE the Germanic languages
were already "sufficiently
different to render communication between the various
peoples impossible". Some evidence point to a common pantheon
made up of several
different chronological layers. However, as for mythology only the Scandinavian
one (see Germanic
mythology) is sufficiently known. Some traces of common traditions
between various tribes are indicated by Beowulf and
the Volsunga saga. One indication
of their shared identity is their common Germanic name for non-Germanic peoples,
*walhaz (plural of *walhoz), from which the local names Welsh, Wallis, Walloon and
others were derived. An indication
of an ethnic unity is the fact that the Romans
knew them as one and gave them a common name, Germani (this is the source
of our
German and Germanic, see Etymology above), although it was well known for the Romans
to give geographical
rather than cultural names to peoples. The very extensive practice
of cremation deprives us of anthropological comparative
material for the earliest
periods to support claims of a longstanding ethnic isolation of a common (Nordic) strain.
By
the late 2nd century BCE, Roman authors recount, Gaul, Italy and Hispania were invaded by migrating
Germanic tribes.
This culminated in military conflict with the armies of the Roman Republic, in particular
those of the Roman Consul
Gaius Marius. Six decades later, Julius Caesar invoked the threat of such attacks
as one justification for his annexation
of Gaul to Rome. As Rome expanded to the Rhine and Danube rivers,
it incorporated many Celtic societies into the Empire.
The tribal homelands to the north and east emerged
collectively in the records as Germania. The peoples of this area
were sometimes at war with Rome, but also
engaged in complex and long-term trade relations, military alliances, and
cultural exchanges with Rome as
well. The Cimbri and Teutoni incursions into Roman Italy were thrust back in 101 BCE.
These invasions were
written up by Caesar and others as presaging of a Northern danger for the Roman Republic, a danger
that
should be controlled. In the Augustean period there was - as a result of Roman activity as far as the Elbe
River - a first definition of the "Germania magna": from Rhine and Danube in the West and South to the
Vistula
and the Baltic Sea in the East and North.
Caesar's wars helped establish the term Germania. The initial purpose of the Roman campaigns
was to
protect Transalpine Gaul by controlling the area between the Rhine and the Elbe. In 9 CE a revolt of
their
Germanic subjects headed by the supposed Roman ally, Arminius, (along with his decisive defeat
of Publius Quinctilius
Varus and the destruction of 3 Roman legions in the surprise attack on the
Romans at the Battle of the Teutoburg Forest)
ended in the withdrawal of the Roman frontier to the
Rhine. At the end of the 1st century two provinces west of the
Rhine called Germania inferior and
Germania superior were established. Important medieval cities like Aachen, Cologne,
Trier, Mainz,
Worms and Speyer were part of these Roman provinces.
The
Migration Period
During the 5th century CE, as the Western Roman Empire lost military strength and political
cohesion,
numerous Germanic peoples, under pressure from population growth and invading Asian groups, began
migrating
en masse in far and diverse directions, taking them to Great Britain and as far south through
present day Continental
Europe to the Mediterranean and northern Africa. Over time, this wandering meant
intrusions into other tribal territories,
and the ensuing wars for land escalated with the dwindling
amount of unoccupied territory. Wandering tribes then began
staking out permanent homes as a means of
protection. Much of this resulted in fixed settlements from which many, under
a powerful leader, expanded
outwards. A defeat meant either scattering or merging with the dominant tribe, and this
continual process
of assimilation was how nations were formed. In Denmark the Jutes merged with the Danes, in Sweden
the
Geats merged with the Swedes. In England, the Angles merged with the Saxons and other groups (notably the
Jutes), as well as possibly absorbing a number of natives, to form the Anglo-Saxons.
A direct result of the Roman retreat
was the disappearance of imported products like ceramics and coins,
and a return to virtually unchanged local Iron Age
production methods. According to recent views this
has caused confusion for decades, and theories assuming the total
abandonment of the coastal regions to
account for an archaeological time gap that never existed have been renounced.
Instead, it has been
confirmed that the Frisian graves had been used without interruption between the 4th and 9th century
CE
and that inhabited areas show continuity with the Roman period in revealing coins, jewellery and ceramics
of
the 5th century. Also, people continued to live in the same three-aisled farmhouse, while to the east
completely new
types of buildings arose. More to the south, in Belgium, archeological results of this
period point to immigration from
the north.
The Germanic Peoples Role in the Fall of Rome
Some of the
Germanic tribes are frequently credited in popular depictions of the decline of the Roman
Empire in the late 5th century.
Professional historians and archaeologists have since the 1950s shifted
their interpretations in such a way that the
Germanic peoples are no longer seen as invading a decaying
empire but as being co-opted into helping defend territory
the central government could no longer
adequately administer. Individuals and small groups from Germanic tribes had long
been recruited from
the territories beyond the limes (i.e., the regions just outside the Roman Empire), and some of them
had
risen high in the command structure of the army. Then the Empire recruited entire tribal groups under
their
native leaders as officers. Assisting with defense eventually shifted into administration and then
outright rule, as
Roman government passed into the hands of Germanic leaders. Odoacer, who deposed
Romulus Augustulus, is the ultimate
example.
The presence of successor states controlled by a nobility from one of the Germanic tribes is evident in
the
6th century - even in Italy, the former heart of the Empire, where Odoacer was followed by Theodoric
the Great, king
of the Ostrogoths, who was regarded by Roman citizens and Gothic settlers alike as
legitimate successor to the rule
of Rome and Italy.
The Early Middle Ages
The transition of the Migration period to the Middle Ages proper takes place
over the course of
the second half of the 1st millennium. It is marked by the Christianization of the Germanic peoples
and the formation of stable kingdoms replacing the mostly tribal structures of the Migration period.
In continental Europe, this is
the rise of Francia in the Merovingian period, eclipsing lesser
kingdoms such as Alemannia. In England, the Wessex hegemony
as the nucleus of the unification
of England, Scandinavia is in the Vendel period and enters the extremely successful
Viking Age,
with expansion to Britain, Ireland and Iceland in the west and as far as Russia and Greece in
the east.
The various Germanic tribal cultures begin their transformation into the larger nations
of later history, English, Norse
and German, and in the case of Burgundy, Lombardy and Normandy
blending into a Romano-Germanic culture.
A main element
uniting Germanic societies is kingship, in origin a sacral institution combining the
functions of military leader, high
priest, lawmaker and judge. Germanic monarchy was elective, the
king was elected by the free men from among elegible
candidates of a family (OE cynn) tracing their
ancestry to the tribe's divine or semi-divine founder.
In early Germanic society, the
free men of property each ruled their own estate and were subject
to the king directly, without any intermediate hierarchy
as in later feudalism. Free men without
landed property could swear fealty to a man of property who as their lord would
then be responsible
for their upkeep, including generous feasts and gifts. This system of sworn retainers was central
to
early Germanic society, and the loyalty of the retainer to his lord was taken to replace his family ties.
Early
Germanic law reflects a hierarchy of worth within the society of free men, reflected in the
differences in weregild.
Among the Anglo-Saxons, a regular free man (a ceorl) had a weregild of
200 shillings (i.e. solidi or gold pieces), classified
as a twyhyndeman "200-man" for this reason,
while a nobleman commanded a fee of six times that amount (twelfhyndeman
"1200-man"). Similarly,
among the Alamanni the basic weregild for a free men was 200 shillings, and the amount
could be
doubled or trebled according to the man's rank. Unfree serfs did not command a weregild, and the
recompense
paid in the event of their death was merely for material damage, 15 shillings in the
case of the Alamanni, increased
to 40 or 50 if the victim had been a skilled artisan.
The social hierarchy is not only reflected in the weregild due in the
case of the violent or accidental
death of a man, but also in differences in fines for lesser crimes. Thus the fines
for insults, injury,
burglary or damage to property differ depending on the rank of the injured party. They do not usually
depend on the rank of the guilty party, although there are some exceptions associated with royal privilege.
Free women
did not have a political station of their own but inherited the rank of their father if
unmarried, or their husband
if married. The weregild or recompense due for the killing or injuring
of a woman is notably set at twice that of a
man of the same rank in Alemannic law.
All freemen had the right to participate in general assemblies or things, where disputes
between
freemen were addressed according to customary law. The king was bound to uphold ancestral law,
but was at the same time the source for new laws for cases not addressed in previous tradition. This
aspect was
the reason for the creation of the various Germanic law codes by the kings following
their conversion to Christianity:
besides recording inherited tribal law, these codes have the
purpose of settling the position of the church and Christian
clergy within society, usually setting
the weregilds of the members of the clerical hierarchy parallel to that of the
existing hierarchy
of nobility, with the position of an archbishop mirroring that of the king.
In the case of a suspected crime, the accused could avoid punishment by
presenting a fixed number
of free men (their number depending on the severity of the crime) prepared to swear an oath
on his
innocence. Failing this, he could prove his innocence in a trial by combat. Corporeal or capital
punishment
for free men does not figure in the Germanic law codes, and banishment appears to be the
most severe penalty issued officially.
This reflects that Germanic tribal law did not have the scope
of exacting revenge, which was left to the judgement of
the family of the victim, but to settle damages
as fairly as possible once an involved party decided to bring a dispute
before the assembly.
Traditional Germanic society is gradually replaced by the system of estates
and feudalism characteristic
of the High Middle Ages in both the Holy Roman Empire and Anglo-Norman England in the 11th
to 12th
centuries, to some extent under the influence of Roman law as an indirect result of Christianization,
but also because political structures had grown too large for the flat hierarchy of a tribal society.
The same effect
of political centralization takes hold in Scandinavia slightly later, in the 12th to
13th century (Age of the Sturlungs,
Consolidation of Sweden, Civil war era in Norway), by the end of the
14th century culminating in the giant Kalmar Union.
Elements of tribal law, notably the wager of battle,
nevertheless remained in effect throughout the Middle Ages, in
the case of the Holy Roman Empire until
the establishment of the Imperial Chamber Court in the beginning German Renaissance.
In the federalist
organization of Switzerland, where cantonal structures remained comparatively local, the Germanic
thing
survived into the 20th century in the form of the Landsgemeinde, albeit subject to federal law.
The
Material Culture
Germanic settlements were typically small, rarely containing much more than ten households, often
less, and
were usually located at clearings in the wood. Settlements remained of a fairly constant
size throughout the period.
The buildings in these villages varied in form, but normally consisted
of farmhouses surrounded by smaller buildings
such as granaries and other storage rooms. The universal
building material was timber. Cattle and humans usually lived
together in the same house.
Although the Germans practiced both agriculture and husbandry, the latter was extremely important both
as a
source of dairy products and as a basis for wealth and social status, which was measured by the
size of an individual's
herd. The diet consisted mainly of the products of farming and husbandry and was
supplied by hunting to a very modest
extent. Barley and wheat were the most common agricultural products
and were used for baking a certain flat type of
bread as well as brewing beer. The fields were tilled with
a light-weight wooden plow, although heavier models also
existed in some areas. Common clothing styles
are known from the remarkably well-preserved corpses that have been found
in former marshes on several
locations in Denmark, and included woolen garments and brooches for women and trousers
and leather caps for
men. Other important small-scale industries were weaving, the manual production of basic pottery
and, more
rarely, the fabrication of iron tools, especially weapons.
Julius Caesar describes the Germans in his Commentarii
De Bello Gallico, though it is still a matter of
debate if he refers to Northern Celtic tribes or clearly identified
German tribes."[The Germans] have
neither Druids to preside over sacred offices, nor do they pay great regard to
sacrifices. They rank in
the number of the gods those alone whom they behold, and by whose instrumentality they are
obviously
benefited, namely, the sun, fire, and the moon; they have not heard of the other deities even by report.
Their whole life is occupied in hunting and in the pursuits of the military art; from childhood they
devote themselves
to fatigue and hardships. Those who have remained chaste for the longest time, receive
the greatest commendation among
their people; they think that by this the growth is promoted, by this
the physical powers are increased and the sinews
are strengthened. And to have had knowledge of a woman
before the twentieth year they reckon among the most disgraceful
acts; of which matter there is no
concealment, because they bathe promiscuously in the rivers and [only] use skins or
small cloaks of
deer's hides, a large portion of the body being in consequence naked.
They do not pay much attention
to agriculture, and a large portion of their food consists in milk, cheese,
and flesh; nor has any one a fixed quantity
of land or his own individual limits; but the magistrates and
the leading men each year apportion to the tribes and
families, who have united together, as much land as,
and in the place in which, they think proper, and the year after
compel them to remove elsewhere. For this
enactment they advance many reasons-lest seduced by long-continued custom,
they may exchange their ardor in
the waging of war for agriculture; lest they may be anxious to acquire extensive estates,
and the more
powerful drive the weaker from their possessions; lest they construct their houses with too great a desire
to avoid cold and heat; lest the desire of wealth spring up, from which cause divisions and discords arise;
and
that they may keep the common people in a contented state of mind, when each sees his own means placed
on an equality
with [those of] the most powerful."
While the Germanic peoples were slowly converted to Christianity by varying means, many elements
of
the pre-Christian culture and indigenous beliefs remained firmly in place after the conversion process,
particularly
in the more rural and distant regions.
The Ostrogoths, Visigoths, and Vandals were Christianized while they were still outside the
bounds of the
Empire; however, they converted to Arianism rather than to orthodox Catholicism, and were soon regarded
as heretics. The one great written remnant of the Gothic language is a translation of portions of the Bible
made
by Ulfilas, the missionary who converted them. The Lombards were not converted until after their
entrance into the Empire,
but received Christianity from Arian Germanic groups.
The Franks were converted directly from paganism to Catholicism without
an intervening time as Arians.
Several centuries later, Anglo-Saxon and Frankish missionaries and warriors undertook
the conversion
of their Saxon neighbours. A key event was the felling of Thor's Oak near Fritzlar by Boniface, apostle
of the Germans, in 723.
Eventually, the conversion was forced by armed force, successfully completed by Charlemagne, in a series
of
campaigns (the Saxon Wars), that also brought Saxon lands into the Frankish empire. Massacres, such
as the Bloody Verdict
of Verden, were a direct result of this policy. In Scandinavia, Germanic paganism
continued to dominate until the 11th
century in the form of Norse paganism, when it was gradually
replaced by Christianity.
The
Post-migration Ethnogeneses
The Germanic tribes of the Migration period had settled down by the Early Middle
Ages,
the latest series of movements out of Scandinavia taking place during the
Viking Age. The Goths and Vandals were linguistically
assimilated to their Latin
(Italo-Western Romance) substrate populations (with the exception of the Crimean
Goths,
who preserved their dialect into the 18th century). Burgundians and
were assimilated into both Latin (French & Italian)
and Germanic populations.
The Viking Age Norsemen split into an Old East Norse and an Old West Norse group, which
further separated into Icelanders, Faroese and Norwegians on one hand, and Swedes and
Danes on the other. Politically,
the union between Norway and Sweden was dissolved in
1905, and the Republic of Iceland was established in 1944. In Great
Britain, Germanic
people coalesced into the Anglo-Saxon or English people between the 8th and 10th centuries.
The
Viking Age
Norsemen split into an Old East Norse and an Old West Norse group, which further
separated
into Icelanders, Faroese and Norwegians on one hand, and Swedes and
Danes on the other. Politically, the union between
Norway and Sweden was dissolved
in 1905, and the Republic of Iceland was established in 1944. In Great Britain,
Germanic people coalesced into the Anglo-Saxon or English people between the 8th
and 10th centuries..
The various Germanic Peoples of the Migrations period eventually
spread out over a vast expanse
stretching from contemporary European Russia to Iceland and from Norway to North Africa.
The
migrants had varying impacts in different regions. In many cases, the newcomers set themselves
up as over-lords
of the pre-existing population. Over time, such groups underwent ethnogenesis,
resulting in the creation of new cultural
and ethnic identities (such as the Franks and Galloromans
becoming French). Thus many of the descendants of the ancient
Germanic Peoples do not speak Germanic
languages, as they were to a greater or lesser degree assimilated into the cosmopolitan,
literate
culture of the Roman world. Even where the descendants of Germanic Peoples maintained greater
continuity
with their common ancestors, significant cultural and linguistic differences arose
over time; as is strikingly illustrated
by the different identities of Christianized Saxon
subjects of the Carolingian Empire and Pagan Scandinavian Vikings.
More broadly,
early Medieval Germanic peoples were often assimilated into the walha substrate
cultures of their subject populations.
Thus, the Burgundians of Burgundy, the Vandals of
Andalusia and the Visigoths of western France and eastern Iberia all
lost their Germanic
identity and became part of Latin Europe. Likewise, the Franks of Western Francia form part
of the ancestry of the French people. Examples of assimilation during the Viking Age include
the Norsemen settled in
Normandy and on the French Atlantic coast, and the societal elite in
medieval Russia among whom many were the descendants
of Slavified Norsemen (a theory, however,
contested by some Slavic scholars in the former Soviet Union, who name it
the Normanist theory).
Conversely, the Germanic settlement of Britain resulted in Anglo-Saxon, or English, displacement
of and/or
cultural assimilation of the indigenous culture, the Brythonic speaking British culture
causing the foundation of a
new Kingdom, England. As in what became England, indigenous Brythonic
Celtic culture in some of the south-eastern parts
of what became Scotland (approximately the
Lothian and Borders region) and areas of what became the Northwest of England
(the kingdoms of
Rheged, Elmet, etc) succumbed to Germanic influence c.600-800, due to the extension of overlordship
and settlement from the Anglo-Saxon areas to the south. Between c. 1150 and c. 1400 most of the
Scottish Lowlands
became English culturally and linquistically through immigration from England,
France and Flanders and from the resulting
assimilation of native Gaelic-speaking Scots. The Scots
language is the resulting Germanic language still spoken in
parts of Scotland and is very similar
to the speech of the Northumbrians of northern England. Between the 15th and 17th
centuries Scots
spread into Galloway,Carrick and parts of the Scottish Highlands, as well as into the Northern
Isles.
The latter, Orkney and Shetland, though now part of Scotland, were nominally part of the
Kingdom of Norway until the
15th century. A version of the Norse language was spoken there from
the Viking invasions until replaced by Scots.
Portugal and
Spain also had some measure of Germanic settlement, due to the Visigoths, the Suebi
(Quadi and Marcomanni) and the Buri,
who settled permanently. The Vandals (Silingi and Hasdingi)
were also present, before moving on to North Africa. Many
words of Germanic origin entered into
the Spanish and Portuguese languages at this time and many more entered through
other avenues
(often French) in the ensuing centuries (see: List of Spanish words of Germanic origin and List
of
Portuguese words of Germanic origin).
Italy has also had a history of heavy Germanic settlement. Germanic tribes such as the Visigoths,
Vandals, and Ostrogoths had successfully invaded and sparsely settled Italy in the 5th century.
Most notably, in
the 6th century, the Germanic tribe known as the Lombards entered and settled
primarily in the area known today as Lombardy.
The Normans also conquered and ruled Sicily and
parts of southern Italy for a time. Crimean Gothic communities appear
to have survived intact
until the late 1700's, when many were deported by Catherine the Great. Their language vanished
by the 1800's.
The territory
of modern Germany was divided between Germanic and Celtic speaking groups in the
last centuries BCE. The parts south
of the Germanic Limes came under limited Latin influence in
the early centuries CE, but were swiftly conquered by Germanic
groups such as the Alemanni after
the fall of the Western Roman Empire. After the disappearance of Germanic ethnicities
(tribes)
in the High Middle Ages, the cultural identity of Europe was built on the idea of Christendom as
opposed
to Islam (the "Saracens", and later the "Turks"). The Germanic peoples of Roman
historiography were
lumped with the other agents of the "barbarian invasions", the Alans and
the
Huns, as opposed to the civilized "Roman" identity of the Holy Roman Empire.
The Renaissance revived interest in pre-Christian Classical
Antiquity and only in a second phase
in pre-Christian Northern Europe. Early modern publications dealing with Old Norse
culture
appeared in the 16th century, e.g. Historia de gentibus septentrionalibus (Olaus Magnus, 1555)
and the first
edition of the 13th century Gesta Danorum (Saxo Grammaticus), in 1514. Authors of
the German Renaissance such as Johannes
Aventinus discovered the Germanii of Tacitus as the "Old
Germans", whose virtue and unspoiled manhood, as it
appears in the Roman accounts of noble savagery,
they contrast with the decadence of their own day. The pace of publication
increased during the 17th
century with Latin translations of the Edda (notably Peder Resen's Edda Islandorum of 1665).
The
Viking revival of 18th century Romanticism finally establishes the fascination with anything "Nordic".
The beginning of Germanic philology proper begins in the early 19th century, with Rasmus Rask's
Icelandic Lexicon of
1814, and was in full bloom by the 1830s, with Jacob Grimm's Deutsche Mythologie
giving an extensive account of the reconstructed
Germanic mythology and his Deutsches Wörterbuch of
Germanic etymology.
The development of Germanic studies
as an academic discipline in the 19th century
ran parallel to the rise of nationalism in Europe and the search for national
histories for the nascent nation states developing after the end of the Napoleonic
Wars. A "Germanic"
national ethnicity offered itself for the unification of Germany,
contrasting the emerging German Empire with its neighboring
rivals, the Welsche
French Third Republic and the "Slavic" Russian Empire. The nascent German ethnicity
was consequently built on national myths of Germanic antiquity, in instances such
ast the Walhalla temple and the
Hermann Heights Monument. These tendencies culminated
in Pan-Germanism, the Alldeutsche Bewegung aiming for the political
unity of all of
German-speaking Europe (all Volksdeutsche) into a Teutonic nation state. Contemporary
Romantic
nationalism in Scandinavia placed more weight on the Viking Age, resulting
in the movement known as Scandinavism. The
theories of race developed in the same
period identified the Germanic peoples of the Migration period as members of
a Nordic
race expanding at the expense of an Alpine race native to Central and Eastern Europe.
The Alphabetic
List of The German Tribes
A
Adogit, Aelvaeones, Aeragnaricii, Ahelmil, Alamanni or Alemanni,
Ambrones, Ampsivarii or Ampsivari, Angles, Angrivarii or
Angrivari, Arochi, Augandzi, Avarpi, Aviones
B
Baemi, Banochaemae, Batavii or Batavi today known by Batavians,
Batini, Bavarii, Bergio, Brisgavi, Brondings, Bructeri, Burgundiones, Buri
C
Calucones, Canninefates, Casuari, Caritni, Chaedini, Chaemae, Chaetuori,
Chali, Chamavi, Charudes, Chasuarii, Chattuarii, Chauci, Cherusci,
Chatti, Cobandi, Condrusi, Corconti, Curiones
D
Danduti, Dani, Dauciones, Diduni, Dulgubnii, Dutch, Danes
E
Eburones, English, Eudoses, Eunixi, Evagre,
F
Faroese, Favonae, Fervir, Finni, Firaesi, Flemish,
Forsi, Franks, Frisians, Fundusi, Fischer
G
Gall-Gaidheal, Gambrivii, Gauthigoth,
Geats, Gepidae, Goths, Gutar Grannii
H
Hallin, Harii, Harudes, Hasdingi, Helisii, Helveconae,
Heruli, Hermunduri, Hilleviones, Horder
I
Ingriones, Ingvaeones (North Sea Germans), Intuergi, Irminones
(Elbe Germans), Istvaeones (Rhine-Weser Germans) Icelanders
J
Jutes, Juthungi
L
Lacringi, Landi, Lemovii, Levoni, Lombards
or Langobardes, Liothida, Lugii
M
Manimi, Marcomanni, Marsi, Marsaci, Marsigni,
Marvingi, Mattiaci, Mixi, Mugilones
N
Naharvali, Narisci or Naristi, Nemetes, Nertereanes,
Nervii, Njars, Norn, Nuitones, Norwegians
O
Ostrogoths, Otingis
P
Pharodini
Q
Quadi
R
Racatae, Racatriae, Ranii, Raumarici, Reudigni, Rugii, Ruticli
S
Sabalingi, Saxons, Scirii, Scots, Segni, Semnoni or Semnones,
Sibini, Sidini, Sigulones, Silingi, Sitones, Suarini or Suardones,
Suebi or Suevi, Suetidi, Suiones, Sugambri
T
Taetel, Tencteri, Teuriochaemae, Teutonoari, Teutons, Theustes, Thuringii,
Toxandri, Treveri, Triboci, Tubanti, Tungri, Turcilingi, Turoni
U
Ubii, Ulmerugi, Usipetes, Usipi or Usippi
V
Vagoth, Vandals, Vangiones, Vargiones, Varini, Varisci,
Vinoviloth, Viruni, Visburgi, Visigoths, Vispi
Z
Zumi
The Mythical founders of The Germanic Tribes
The
preserved mythical founders and namesakes of some Germanic tribes: